The Legal Driving Age Definition

Without personal mobility, young people are limited in where and when they go. This not only has an impact on the human rights of young people, but can also have wider implications, such as a blow to the economy when young people find that their ability to work is limited. Restrict the freedom of young people? You`re kidding? Freedom is everything for young people. If you take that away, what do they have? Just because someone is young doesn`t mean they`re not able to drive safely. The younger the driver, the more he learns. If you do, it can lead to more teenagers driving illegally. I think 16 is a bit young to be on the road, like it is in America. But 17 is not really better. Why can children take to the streets in a potential killing machine at 17 and drink alcohol at 18? I`m not sure about the age of drinking and driving because everything seems a bit upside down. The risk of impaired driving is high if the 16-year-old looks older and is not asked for identification. Maybe driving at 18 and drinking at 21? Not all young people are irresponsible, but they may be more naïve or adventurous and not always fully aware of the consequences.

I fear that they will learn to drive and then become arrogant about their ability to drive drunk. If they drive at 18 and drink at 21, they drive for at least three years. But to be honest, nothing we do here is 100% safe. All these alternatives have their own advantages and disadvantages and should be considered in conjunction with a change in the minimum age. Alternatives to making a test more difficult are still not a good way to prevent young teens from driving recklessly. There are many smart teenagers who can take a test, but it`s different when they`re behind the wheel alone or with other passengers. People`s thoughts at a young age are very distracted by a lot of information from school, friends and relatives. Plus, there are plenty of professionals out there for aging, so why not give it a try? I am sorry, but I strongly disagree with you. Yes, I agree that there are immature sixteen-year-olds who are like that, but you can`t stereotype ALL sixteen-year-olds because someone else did something silly at that age. I`m sixteen years old and I drive better than half the “adults” on the road I see today. There are people of all ages who drive recklessly on the road because they think they are adults, so they can get away with it. I know people who were over the age of 16 – more likely between the ages of 18 and 30 – who have been caught driving drunk or even died, but they don`t expect that to happen to them because they are “responsible drivers.” What matters most is whether you are MATURE and RESPONSIBLE.

Keep in mind that just because your teen is old enough to drive legally doesn`t mean they`re mature enough to take matters into their own hands. If a teenager is caught sending messages or using a cell phone while driving, there should be clear consequences. Romer D, Lee Y-C, Mcdonald CC, Winston FK. Adolescence, attention distribution and driving safety. J Youth health. 2014;54(5 suppl):S6-15. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.10.202 This has nothing to do with raising the legal driving age. First of all, there is already a restriction that states that a driver under the age of 18 cannot have more than one family member under the age of 18 as a passenger in his car.

Learn the facts. And why should all young drivers be punished for the mistakes of a few? Since some studies have shown that 77% of men of all ages are more likely to kill someone than a woman, should men also be banned from having passengers? Also, I thought the “P” plate process is a “settling” process where PROVISIONAL runners are observed more closely than open-air runners. So why don`t parents pick up teens` phones when they drive and return it later? I think the SMS Sited should automatically be a ticket while driving. DON`T PUNISH ALL TEENAGERS for the careless few. You should raise the legal driving age to 18, as most of the wreckage that occurs comes from teenagers. Teenagers have a certain way of thinking that “I win, you lose”, a kind of attitude. Or the “My way or not”. I haven`t started with Drivers Ed yet, but I really think they should keep the driving age because that`s the only thing I don`t think is fair, once you`re 18 you can get your licenses. I think everyone should take the course to make sure everyone understands driving because driving is a skill It takes time and I want to know everything and make sure I`m good at driving before I hit the road because I don`t want to be the person who kills someone because I`m a reckless driver, No one wants to be that person, right? Yes, it will help, at 19 years old, I can say that at the age of 16-17 I had no idea how to deal with snowy environments. Considering that we are only taught to drive in the clear summer sky, they never prepare you for difficult driving conditions. Now I`m 19, I know a lot of roads, I know the speed limit, I know how tight the turns are, I know where the potholes are. All these things must be taken into account in order to understand the road.

I can also admit that I was immature in high school and see a lot more immature teenagers. Driving to impress people, driving furiously, texting and driving. It would be very beneficial to raise the driving age to 18, and I think it should be 20. Applications for provisional driving licences may be submitted from the age of 16. It was cancelled because the 2 wheels under 50cc are no longer produced. After reaching the age of 18, a person can obtain a licence from the regional traffic office in his district. Most provinces and territories recognize driver`s licences issued by another jurisdiction, which may allow a youth to obtain a driver`s licence in a province or territory with a low minimum driving age and to drive in a province or territory that usually has a higher driving age. A notable exception is the United States, where many states prohibit drivers from driving below their minimum driving age, even if they have licenses or licenses issued by another state.

Young and even older drivers cause many fatal accidents; Raising the minimum age at which people are allowed to drive might reduce that, but is it a benefit to society, and are the statistics true? We can help reduce accident rates if the driving age is raised to 18 so that no more children can be injured or killed in an accident on the motorway or by another car colliding with their car, if we increase the driving age, it will be safer for young and old. Minimum age may vary depending on the type of vehicle. This list refers to the minimum age for driving a light-duty motor vehicle (generally less than 3500 kg maximum permissible mass) or motorcycle, if applicable. People have this overly strong stance towards 16-year-old drivers and believe that they should take the initiative to raise the legal age to 18. It is impossible to make assumptions about the general adolescent population because a tiny percentage of other adolescents are irresponsible. A lack of maturity does not matter in these situations, because learning to drive is acquired through experience. As an 18-year-old, as a driver, they do not have to have any other requirements than to pass the driving test to get their driver`s license. Would you believe that an 18-year-old with no prior learning experience is better prepared than a 16-year-old who has met all the necessary requirements and more? Everyone is different. To say that someone is not mentally mature at the age of seventeen is a general generalization. Some people by the age of 18 may not have reached what the proposal calls “full mental maturity.” Some people may never reach “full spiritual maturity.” We get tired at different speeds, so we have safety precautions to make sure drivers have sufficient “mental maturity” and this is called the “driving test”.

If you fail, you can`t drive legally without someone who has a clean driver`s license with you for three years. This is a violation of the law and will be punished. Raising the age to 18 would have no effect, as the driving test is designed to ensure the “mental maturity” of the driver before he is fully qualified. Peole will be the same, regardless of age! There are people who are 20 years old and older who are not yet mature. So it depends on what kind of person you are. People have to grow up at some point. I`m 17, I didn`t take any pilots, I answered ten questions for my written driving test (in Oklahoma), I failed my behind-the-seat test, I came back, I got a hundred, I still need to be arrested and get a ticket. I`ve never been into a wreck, I don`t talk on the phone, I can drive easily in cities like Los Angeles and San Francisco. And see many, many, many terrible drivers everywhere I go.

I don`t think the age limit should be increased, I think if you get it wrong, once you lose your driving time privilege. Stupid biased point. I am a woman from the United Kingdom and I do not agree that 17-year-olds are immature. Some are, but not all, they are mainly “running boys” who do not knock everyone over. Adults are also at risk of falling. So do not increase old age, because it is an unnecessary waste of time and money. The proposal forgets that drivers are not “dropped” on the roads, but must first pass a test to ensure their ability to drive. And to generalize and say that 17-year-olds are immature is wrong.

In fact, many running boys are at least over 20 years old. Meet Top Gear`s presenters and audience. Why do we still live in the past when, for example, the media doesn`t promote things they used to do (e.g., cigarettes) and knowledge has evolved so that people know how hooves turn and spin in teenagers` minds. If we ban driving until the age of eighteen, young teenagers will feel compelled to drive only to contradict the law and thus lower opinions about driving for those under 18.